Evaluating older Cube 3D printers already held by schools
An older Cube printer should be evaluated as a particular existing device with a known history. Cube 2nd generation, Cube 3rd generation and CubePro Duo equipment should not be treated as interchangeable. Establish the exact model, available documentation and usable workflow before deciding whether to retain it for supervised school activity.
Identify the machine and its complete setup
Record the model and serial details from the equipment itself, together with any accessories, power supply and material cartridges held by the school. Distinguish a Cube 2nd generation from a Cube 3rd generation or CubePro Duo rather than relying on a photograph or the colour of the enclosure.
Collect the documentation and files already held with the machine. List which software, computer, connection method and consumables the established workflow requires. This guide makes no claim that a particular download, online service, activation route or replacement cartridge remains available. Verify any dependency directly before making it part of a lesson plan.
Assess condition before attempting a project
Ask an appropriately competent person to review the device and its operating arrangements. A machine that powers on has not thereby been shown suitable for continued use. Include physical condition, documented maintenance, hot and moving parts, and the management of emissions within the school’s assessment of filament printing.
Do not bypass guards, cartridge controls or other operating restrictions to keep the unit running. If the necessary instructions or suitable materials cannot be established, record that gap and pause the proposed activity. The decision should be based on a supportable process, not the wish to recover value from an old purchase.
Prove a small, useful workflow
If continued use is judged appropriate, test a modest object with no time-critical classroom dependency. Record how the design file is prepared, transferred, printed and retained, along with staff time and any failures. Use the result to decide whether the equipment can support a limited demonstration, a small design project or neither.
Compare retention with the cost of maintaining the full workflow, including staff expertise and consumables. Keep a clear alternative for pupils whose learning does not require this specific machine. If retirement is chosen, preserve useful design work in an approved school location and arrange equipment disposal through the school’s established process.
Action checklist
- Identify the exact generation or CubePro model.
- List every software, material and connection dependency.
- Obtain a competent condition and risk review.
- Prove a small complete workflow before scheduling pupil work.
Common questions
Does this guide confirm current Cube software or consumable support?
No. Availability and compatibility must be verified for the exact device and workflow. The guide helps a school evaluate equipment it already holds.
Sources and scope
Source titles are provided for reference. Check the current original guidance and your school's circumstances before making a policy or compliance decision.
- Schools Direct editorial — Original school resource planning guidance and worked examples. Checked 1 November 2026.
- CLEAPSS and Health and Safety Executive — 3D printing in schools and colleges: managing the risks. Checked 1 November 2026.